Given the audit excerpt, what is the most secure way to allow specific files?

The chosen answer emphasizes a highly secure method of granting permissions to specific files. This approach allows for a complex and detailed rule that incorporates multiple factors: the exact file path of the script, the specific process that triggers its execution, and the originating application that created the file. By requiring all these conditions to be met, it significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access or execution of malicious files.

Setting permissions this way means that even if an attacker managed to get access to the system, they would still need to meet all those exact parameters to execute that specific script. This creates a strong barrier against misuse, as it restricts permissions to a very fine level of granularity that not only identifies the file by its location but also ties it to legitimate processes and applications.

Regarding the other options, while some may provide a level of control, they lack the comprehensive security that the selected choice delivers. For example, permitting by file size is too vague, as it doesn't specify what files are allowed based on their behavior or context; allowing permission based on a generic application could expose vulnerabilities in other instances of the app; and permitting by date modified does not consider the actual process or legitimacy of the action being taken on the file.

In contrast, the third option includes