What strategy does ThreatLocker use to manage false positives?

ThreatLocker employs a review mechanism by users and administrators to manage false positives effectively. This strategy is vital in ensuring that alerts or security events flagged by the system are accurately assessed for their legitimacy. By involving both users and administrators in this review process, the system harnesses human insight and expertise, enabling a more nuanced evaluation of alerts.

This collaborative approach allows for the identification of legitimate security incidents while minimizing the risk of overlooking genuine threats or falsely classifying them as benign. Engaging users who may have firsthand knowledge about certain applications or actions provides valuable context that automated systems might miss. Therefore, this method enhances the reliability of the alert system and reduces the likelihood of unnecessary disruptions caused by false positives.

The other choices reflect less effective strategies, such as automatic rejection or unreviewed storage, which could compromise security by overlooking real threats or failing to address potential issues. Ignoring false positives entirely would lead to a dangerous complacency regarding alerts, undermining the purpose of a robust security framework. Thus, the review mechanism stands out as the most effective method for managing false positives.